Both the right and gay/lesbian communities appear to possess just two feasible different types of bisexuality

Both the right and gay/lesbian communities appear to possess just two feasible different types of bisexuality

“TRANSITIONAL” OR “PATHOLOGICAL” MODELS?

Both the right and communities that are gay/lesbian to possess just two feasible types of bisexuality, neither of which represents bisexual people accurately. The foremost is the “transitional model” of bisexuality, thinking that most bisexuals are in reality homosexual or lesbian but are simply on the road to sooner or later being released as homosexual. One other could be the “pathological model”, that bisexuals are neurotic or mentally unstable as they are in conflict attempting to determine if they are straight or gay/lesbian, and they simply can’t come to a decision. Both models see bisexuality as a short-term experience or even a “phase” created away from confusion instead of a traditional intimate orientation. Some see bisexuality as inherently subversive since it blurs the boundaries, confronting both heterosexuals and men that are gay lesbian ladies with intimate ambiguity. As a result, bisexuality challenges principles of sexuality, traditional relationship and household structures, monogamy, sex, and identification. Bisexuals cannot conform to either the homosexual or right globe or they might never be bisexual. Alternatively they must re invent personal ethics though they don’t fit anyone else’s rules for themselves, and create responsible lifestyles and relationships that serve their needs even. Continue reading “Both the right and gay/lesbian communities appear to possess just two feasible different types of bisexuality”